Textile numbering systems

Learn more

Intro

The linear density of textile fibres, filaments, yarns, threads, and similar materials is expressed as a ratio of weight to length. Various numbering systems are used internationally, depending on the defined reference value. As a result, these systems can still differ today between raw materials and countries, which may make it difficult to compare linear densities directly. It is therefore important to have a thorough understanding of the existing numbering systems and how they are converted. In principle, a distinction is made between the fixed-length system and the fixed-weight system.

Fixed length system

In the case of fixed length system, the weight is fixed and the thread length variable, i.e. the length of the sample is divided by a constant weight, e.g. 1 g.

Formula: Count (by length) = length / weight

The following rule applies when using this system: The higher the count, the finer the thread. This means that the fixed length system is inversely proportional.

Linear density indicators

Nm (metric count) = length (m) per 1 gram (g)
Example: Nm 10 means that 1 g of a sample is 10 m long.

NeB (British cotton count) = Length (m) per 0.59 g
Example: NeB 10 means that 0.59 g of a sample is 10 m long.

Historically based on English units of measurement: NeB indicates how many hanks (ply) of 840 yards (768.1 m) each weigh 1 lb (English pound = 453.6 g).

Fixed weight system

In the fixed-weight system, the thread length is fixed while the weight varies. This means that the weight of a specific thread sample is divided by a constant length, for example 1,000 m.

Formula: Count (by weight) = weigth / length

The following rule applies when using this system: the lower the count, the finer the thread. This means that the fixed-weight system is directly proportional.

Linear density indicators

Tex = Weight (g) per 1,000 m
Example: 10 Tex means that 1,000 meters of a sample weigh 10 grams.

Dtex (decitex) = Weight (g) per 10,000 m
Example: 10 dtex means that 10,000 meters of a sample weigh 10 grams.

Td (Titer denier) = Gewicht (g) pro 9.000 m
Example: 10 Td means that 9,000 m of a sample weighs 10 g.


In 1967, the various linear density indicators (Nm, NeB, Td) were officially replaced by the internationally established Tex system, which is now valid and mandatory for all fibres, semi-finished products, yarns, threads, and related areas, regardless of fibre type. Today, the Tex system is the most frequently used textile numbering system and is used by all partners in the global textile chain worldwide.

At the same time, however, other linear density indicators are still in use. Names that have been established over many years remain familiar and cannot easily be replaced through standardisation. One example is tights, which are still classified using the denier system (denier, “Den”). This well-known and widely recognised indicator will most likely continue to be used in the future in order to avoid unnecessary consumer confusion that could arise from switching to a standardised system. There are also historical particularities in the linear density designation of sewing and embroidery threads, known as ticket numbers, which are discussed in the following section.

The following tables present formulas for converting between different numbering systems, and a comparison table illustrates the linear densities used in practice. It should be noted that the values apply to the yarn itself, while ply is not taken into account.

Conversion table

Known isSeeking for
Linear densityAbbreviationNmNeBTexdTexTd
Metric countNm-Nm x 0.591,000 : Nm10,000 : Nm9,000 Nm
British cotton countNeBNeB : 0.59-590 : NeB5,900 : NeB5,310 : NeB
TexTex1,000 : Tex590 : Tex-Tex x 10Tex x 9
DecitexdTex10,000 : dTex5,900 : dTexdTex : 10-dTex x 0.9
Titer deniertD (den)9,000 : Td5,310 : TdTd : 9Td : 0.9-
Example50 Tex

1,000 : 50 

Tex = 20 NeB

590 : 50 Tex = 11.8 NeB-50 Tex x 10 = 500 dTex50 Tex x 9 = 450 Td.

Comparison table

NmNeBTexdTexTdThread length per kg
10.591,00010,0009,0001,000 m
215005,0004,5002,000 m
323333,3333,0003,000 m
422502,5002,2504,000 m
532002,0001,8005,000 m
641671,6671,5006,000 m
741431,4291,2867,000 m
851251,2501,1258,000 m
951111,1111,0009,000 m
1061001,00090010,000 m
1169190981811,000 m
1278383375012,000 m
1387776969213,000 m
1596766760015,000 m
18115655650018,000 m
20125050045020,000 m
25154040036025,000 m
30183333330030,000 m
35212928625735,000 m
40242525022540,000 m
45272222220045,000 m
50302020018050,000 m
55321818216455,000 m
60351716715060,000 m
65381515413865,000 m
70411414312970,000 m
75441313312075,000 m
80471312511380,000 m
85501211810685,000 m
90531111110090,000 m
9546111059595,000 m
100591010090100,000 m
10562109586105,000 m
1106599182110,000 m
1156898778115,000 m
1207188375120,000 m
1257488072125,000m
1307787769130,000m
1408377164140,000m
1508976760150,000m
1609466356160,000m
17010065953170,000m
18010665650180,000m
19011255347190,000m
20011855045200,000m
21012454843210,000m

 

The comparison table was compiled in accordance with DIN 60 905. For practical purposes, some values have been rounded up or down.

FAQ